Histologic evaluation and removal torque analysis of nano- and microtreated titanium implants in the dogs 세부내용 목록
[etc.] Histologic evaluation and removal torque analysis of nano- and microtreated titanium implants in the dogs
Writer	administrator
Date	2017-01-12
Hit	38512
Reference : Click J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Jul; 1(2): 75 84. Published online 2009 Jul 31. doi: 10.4047/jap.2009.1.2.75 PMCID: PMC2994682 Histologic evaluation and removal torque analysis of nano- and microtreated titanium implants in the dogs Seok Ahn, DDS, MSD,1 Mong-Sook Vang, DDS, MSD, PhD,2 Hong-So Yang, DDS, MSD, PhD,2 Sang-Won Park, DDS, MSD, PhD,2 and Hyun-Pil Lim, DDS, MSD3 Go to: Abstract STATEMENT OF PROBLEM A number of studies about the nano-treated surfaces of implants have been conducting along with micro-treated surfaces of implants. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to get information for the clinical use of nano-treated surfaces compared with micro-treated surfaces by measuring removal torque and analyzing histological characteristics after the placement of various surface-treated implants on femurs of dogs. MATERIAL AND METHODS Machined surface implants were used as a control group. 4 nano-treated surface implants and 3 micro-treated surface implants [resorbable blast media surface (RBM), sandblast and acid-etched surface (SAE), anodized RBM surface] were used as experimental groups. Removal torque values of implants were measured respectively and the histological analyses were conducted on both 4weeks and 8weeks after implant surgery. The surfaces of removed implants after measuring removal torque values were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 8 weeks. RESULTS 1. Removal torque values of the nano-treated groups were lower than those of micro-treated groups. 2. Removal torque values were similar in the anodized RBM surface groups. 3. On the histological views, there was much of bone formation at 8 weeks, but there was no difference between 4 and 8 weeks, and between the types of implant surfaces as well. CONCLUSION It is suggested that implant topography is more effective in removal torque test than surface chemistry. To get better clinical result, further studies should be fulfilled on the combined effect of surface topography and chemistry for the implant surface treatments. Keywords:
Comment	Writer Password O.K

J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Jul; 1(2): 75 84.

Published online 2009 Jul 31. doi: 10.4047/jap.2009.1.2.75

PMCID: PMC2994682

Histologic evaluation and removal torque analysis of nano- and microtreated titanium implants in the dogs

Seok Ahn, DDS, MSD,1 Mong-Sook Vang, DDS, MSD, PhD,2 Hong-So Yang, DDS, MSD, PhD,2 Sang-Won Park, DDS, MSD, PhD,2 and Hyun-Pil Lim, DDS, MSD3

Go to:

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

A number of studies about the nano-treated surfaces of implants have been conducting along with micro-treated surfaces of implants.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to get information for the clinical use of nano-treated surfaces compared with micro-treated surfaces by measuring removal torque and analyzing histological characteristics after the placement of various surface-treated implants on femurs of dogs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Machined surface implants were used as a control group. 4 nano-treated surface implants and 3 micro-treated surface implants [resorbable blast media surface (RBM), sandblast and acid-etched surface (SAE), anodized RBM surface] were used as experimental groups. Removal torque values of implants were measured respectively and the histological analyses were conducted on both 4weeks and 8weeks after implant surgery. The surfaces of removed implants after measuring removal torque values were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 8 weeks.

RESULTS

1. Removal torque values of the nano-treated groups were lower than those of micro-treated groups. 2. Removal torque values were similar in the anodized RBM surface groups. 3. On the histological views, there was much of bone formation at 8 weeks, but there was no difference between 4 and 8 weeks, and between the types of implant surfaces as well.

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that implant topography is more effective in removal torque test than surface chemistry. To get better clinical result, further studies should be fulfilled on the combined effect of surface topography and chemistry for the implant surface treatments.

Keywords:

Prev	Anorganic Bone Mineral Coated with Tetra-Cell Adhesion Molecule Enhances the Activation of Osteoblast-Like Cells
Next	3rd Poster Competition; Two provisionals

Surgery

Restorative

Digital

Implant

Surgical

Restorative

Digital

Other

Event Conferences

Calendar

Publication